|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: limit problem
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg58924] Re: limit problem
- From: "David W. Cantrell" <DWCantrell at sigmaxi.org>
- Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 01:21:46 -0400 (EDT)
- References: <dbt3lm$sk4$1@smc.vnet.net>
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
Chris Chiasson <chris.chiasson at gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear MathGroup,
> Honestly, I see no reason why this should return "unevaluated" instead of
> zero.
>
> FullSimplify[Limit[E^(-R t),t\[Rule]Infinity],Infinity>R>0&&Element[R,
> Reals]]
>
> 5.2 on windows
That seems like a good point. My guessplanation is that perhaps conditions
given for Simplify or FullSimplify are not used inside of Limit.
Note that one need not even ask for simplification if, _prior_ to asking
for the limit, it is specified that 0 < R < Infinity:
In[4]:= Assuming[0 < R < Infinity, Limit[E^(-R t), t -> Infinity]]
Out[4]= 0
using version 5.1 on Windows.
David
Prev by Date:
rotate frametick labels
Next by Date:
Re: New to Mathematica- How to write functions????????
Previous by thread:
Re: limit problem
Next by thread:
Re: limit problem
|