|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: limit problem
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg58930] Re: limit problem
- From: "Carl K. Woll" <carlw at u.washington.edu>
- Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 01:21:50 -0400 (EDT)
- Organization: University of Washington
- References: <dbt3lm$sk4$1@smc.vnet.net>
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
"Chris Chiasson" <chris.chiasson at gmail.com> wrote in message
news:dbt3lm$sk4$1 at smc.vnet.net...
> Dear MathGroup,
> Honestly, I see no reason why this should return "unevaluated" instead of
> zero.
>
> FullSimplify[Limit[E^(-R
> t),t\[Rule]Infinity],Infinity>R>0&&Element[R,Reals]]
>
> 5.2 on windows
>
If you give the assumption directly to Limit, then you can get the answer
you want:
In[5]:=
Limit[Exp[-R t], t -> Infinity, Assumptions -> R > 0]
Out[5]=
0
Carl Woll
Wolfram Research
> Regards,
> --
> Chris Chiasson
> http://chrischiasson.com/
> 1 (810) 265-3161
>
Prev by Date:
Re: LegendreP error (bug?) in Mathematica
Next by Date:
Setting gridlines thickness in Plot
Previous by thread:
Re: limit problem
Next by thread:
Re: limit problem
|