|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Epilog -vs- Prolog -vs- DisplayTogether
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg58125] Re: Epilog -vs- Prolog -vs- DisplayTogether
- From: ATandT <aguette at attglobal.net>
- Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 03:43:28 -0400 (EDT)
- References: <d90t9l$98f$1@smc.vnet.net>
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
On Sat, 18 Jun 2005 05:33:25 -0500, David Park <djmp at earthlink.net> wrote:
> The Mathematica graphics paradigm is built around a collection of what I
> call set-piece plots. A set-piece plot is a plot of a particular kind and
> [snipped]
> That's why I put together the DrawGraphics package, available at my web
> site. There, each of the set-piece plots is converted to a corresponding
Readers might take self promotion with a grain of salt -- but let me attest
that David Park's DrawGraphics package is well constructed, intuitive, easy
to use, includes complete help pages (integrated into the browser), etc. I
strongly suggest taking a look at it, even for fairly simple graphics.
Prev by Date:
Re: Baker-Campell-Hausdorff
Next by Date:
Re: spotlight escape sequences
Previous by thread:
Re: Re: Epilog -vs- Prolog -vs- DisplayTogether
Next by thread:
Help in making simple 3d spiral...tai sal
|