|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Nested Commutators
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg58124] Re: [mg58114] Nested Commutators
- From: Pratik Desai <pdesai1 at umbc.edu>
- Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 03:43:28 -0400 (EDT)
- References: <200506181008.GAA08906@smc.vnet.net>
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
Shug Boabby wrote:
>hi there,
>
>i have searched the archive for theads on nested commutators in
>mathematica, but i found no answer to my problem and i was wondering if
>anyone had any helpful advise for me.
>
>i wish to be able to define a commutator[A, B]
> http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Commutator.html
>between 2 operators.
>
>for example i would like to be able to define an algebra by presenting
>the commutators, such as
> [A, B] = B
> [A, C] = C
> [B, C] = D
>(also explicitly defining the rest to be zero) and then be able to ask
>mathematica to return the solution when i nest the operators like so
> [A, [A, [A, B]]]
>which should return B
> [A, [B, C]]
>should return 0.
>
>it would also be nice if the Jacobi identities are used in
>simplification routines, so that terms such as
> [X, [Y, [X, Y]]]
> -[Y, [X, [Y, X]]]
> [[X, [Y, X]], Y]
>are identified as being the same as
> [Y, [X, [X, Y]]]
>right ordering the output when the commutators cannot be calculated
>explicitly.
>
>apologies if you have seen this question recently... i stupidly asked
>it at the end of my last posting where it is surely to be missed. this
>question really warrants its own thread.
>
>
>
Hi
I found this package a some time back on Mathematica Information Center,
maybe this is what you are looking for.
http://library.wolfram.com/infocenter/MathSource/4271/
Best regards
--
Pratik Desai
Graduate Student
UMBC
Department of Mechanical Engineering
Phone: 410 455 8134
Prev by Date:
Re: Problems with my first package:Statistics`Common`RegressionCommon`BestFitParameters instead ofBestFitParameters
Next by Date:
Re: Nested Commutators
Previous by thread:
Nested Commutators
Next by thread:
Re: Nested Commutators
|