|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: NSum: badly missed Option
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg56938] Re: NSum: badly missed Option
- From: "antononcube" <antononcube at gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 03:43:02 -0400 (EDT)
- References: <200505070816.EAA20223@smc.vnet.net><d5j5ob$qf3$1@smc.vnet.net> <d5kb13$2at$1@smc.vnet.net>
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
Alan wrote:
> "Chris Chiasson" <chris.chiasson at gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:d5j5ob$qf3$1 at smc.vnet.net...
> > Try SetOptions on NIntegrate before the NSum call.
>
> Excellent. Thanks for the solution!
>
> regards,
> alan
Nested Method option can be used in NSum.
For example:
In[1]:= NSum[1/(x20*Sin[x]^2), {x, 2, Infinity}, Method -> NIntegrate]
NIntegrate::ncvb:
NIntegrate failed to converge to prescribed accuracy after 7
recursive bisections in x near x = 18.8764.
Out[1]= 1.16782 10^-6
In[2]:= NSum[1/(x20*Sin[x]^2), {x, 1, Infinity}, Method -> {NIntegrate,
MaxRecursion -> 100}]
NIntegrate::slwcon:
Numerical integration converging too slowly; suspect one of the
following:
singularity, value of the integration being 0, oscillatory
integrand, or
insufficient WorkingPrecision. If your integrand is oscillatory try
using
the option Method->Oscillatory in NIntegrate.
Out[2]= 1.41228
Anton Antonov
Wolfram Research, Inc.
Prev by Date:
Re: Re: How to quickly find number of non-zero elements in sparse matrix rows?
Next by Date:
Re: Partitioning a list from an index
Previous by thread:
Re: NSum: badly missed Option
Next by thread:
Re: Re: NSum: badly missed Option
|