Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums
-----
 /
MathGroup Archive
2005
*January
*February
*March
*April
*May
*June
*July
*August
*September
*October
*November
*December
*Archive Index
*Ask about this page
*Print this page
*Give us feedback
*Sign up for the Wolfram Insider

MathGroup Archive 2005

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Re: how to map function with over 1 arguments to list

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg57269] Re: [mg57248] Re: how to map function with over 1 arguments to list
  • From: DrBob <drbob at bigfoot.com>
  • Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 02:20:38 -0400 (EDT)
  • References: <d6mlrv$g9v$1@smc.vnet.net> <200505220414.AAA17588@smc.vnet.net>
  • Reply-to: drbob at bigfoot.com
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

That's why I'd use the equivalent f@@@{{1,1},{2,2}}.

It's a situation that comes up fairly often.

Bobby

On Sun, 22 May 2005 00:14:12 -0400 (EDT), David Bailey <dave at Remove_Thisdbailey.co.uk> wrote:

> David,
>
> In any other context than Mathematica (and presumably APL),
> f @@ # & /@
>
> would have a totally different meaning! My brain starts to run out of
> stack space when I try to process strings of operators like that.
>
> David Bailey
> http://www.dbaileyconsultancy.co.uk
>
>
>
>



-- 
DrBob at bigfoot.com


  • Prev by Date: Re: Crossing of 3D functions
  • Next by Date: Re: StringReplace
  • Previous by thread: Re: how to map function with over 1 arguments to list
  • Next by thread: Re: Re: how to map function with over 1 arguments to list