Re: Re: Nestwhile IHB

*To*: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net*Subject*: [mg57392] Re: [mg57229] Re: [mg57201] Nestwhile IHB*From*: Pratik Desai <pdesai1 at umbc.edu>*Date*: Thu, 26 May 2005 04:31:47 -0400 (EDT)*References*: <EC9C79ED705B7D498CE6892836AA3CAA5A2340@EAHQ-CSMB9.rws.ad.ea.com>*Sender*: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

Barthelet, Luc wrote: >How is it going? Do you still need help? >Dr Bob pointed out a few things, so were you able to fix them? >If so you should upload the new notebook. > >You might also want to add as much english text as possible to explain >what you are trying to do. Maybe even line per line. I still do not >understand what you are trying to do and what results you would like to >see. > >How are you going to know you have the proper result? >Maybe we should study a bit that function d[e,dw]? Do you know what it >is supposed to look like? > >Some of the stuff. > >C[j_] has a t variable in there is that normal? >Same for uo[j_] >The delta is using delta and deltab which are undefined. >The integrals are using p as a variable that is not defined. >Plus the other issues that Dr Bob mentioned of course. > >If you stick to this we will help you get to a successful result. > >Cheers, >Luc > > > > Dr Bob and Luc Well here we go again You guys were right Nestwhile was not needed, although the idea of Nestuntil is not an entirely bad one. Anyhow, I was partially successful in finishing the project, if you are interested please click on the image or nb file at wiki http://www.mathematica-users.org/webMathematica/wiki/wiki.jsp?pageName=Notebook:ihb2.nb I am getting closer to what I want but my computer crashes every time I try to increase the number of terms. I can only do up to j=4 i.e 9 terms . Any takers :-) Thanks again for all of your help Until next time Pratik -- Pratik Desai Graduate Student UMBC Department of Mechanical Engineering Phone: 410 455 8134