|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: MiniMaxApproximation question
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg62017] Re: MiniMaxApproximation question
- From: michael_chang86 at hotmail.com
- Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 03:45:33 -0500 (EST)
- References: <dkhlve$2d9$1@smc.vnet.net>
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
Hi Jose,
Many thanks for your response and help; I tried the Padé approximation
routine, and this is 'better', but I'm still seeking the ubiquitous
Chebyshev 'equioscillation' (or 'alternation') behaviour in terms of
*absolute* error.
Am I missing something simple here <doh!>? For what I am seeking
(equioscillation), it appears that Mathematica only optimizes for
*relative* error. Have I missed a more basic command that does what I
want?
Thanks,
Michael
Jose Luis Gomez wrote:
> Michael
> I am not sure, but I think that the standard AddOn <<Calculus`Pade` might be
> useful for you. See this link:
>
> http://documents.wolfram.com/mathematica/Add-onsLinks/StandardPackages/Calcu
> lus/Pade.html
>
> Hope that helps
> Jose
>
<Snip>
Prev by Date:
Re: integer solution
Next by Date:
Re: Following Help Links with the Keyboard
Previous by thread:
Re: MiniMaxApproximation question
Next by thread:
Re: MiniMaxApproximation question
|