Re: How does NIntegrate suppress messages?

*To*: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net*Subject*: [mg62436] Re: How does NIntegrate suppress messages?*From*: "Alan" <info at optioncity.REMOVETHIS.net>*Date*: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 06:33:34 -0500 (EST)*References*: <dm1b0v$ic1$1@smc.vnet.net>*Sender*: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

"Andrew Moylan" <andrew.moylan at anu.edu.au> wrote in message news:dm1b0v$ic1$1 at smc.vnet.net... > Whenever the integrand in NIntegrate generates messages (by calling > Message), the output of these messages are suppressed, although they are > still generated in the sense that they can be caught using Check. Does > anyone know how NIntegrate does this? I don't, but your post answers a question of mine about behavior which has always seemed a puzzle. Often I will wrap a complicated computation in a Check in order to Abort[] on any message. Then, I will sometimes get an Abort[], but no message! And, indeed, often an NIntegrate is involved. When that occurs, I have never been able to re-write the code to retrieve those missing messages. So if there is a way to "unsuppress", that will be helpful to me, too. regards, alan