|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Hardcopy or electronic books?
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg62658] Re: Hardcopy or electronic books?
- From: Paul Abbott <paul at physics.uwa.edu.au>
- Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 00:08:08 -0500 (EST)
- Organization: The University of Western Australia
- References: <dln1n3$glk$1@smc.vnet.net> <dlp2e0$mt$1@smc.vnet.net>
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
In article <dlp2e0$mt$1 at smc.vnet.net>, AES <siegman at stanford.edu>
wrote:
> On the other hand, nothing replaces doing a full-text electronic search
> through a long electronic document or manual looking for some term;
Actually, there is another "type" of searching: The Wolfram Functions
site http://functions.wolfram.com permits searching via Mathematica
patterns -- which is clearly an extension of text searching (see The
Mathematica Journal 9(4), 2005: 713-726 for Michael Trott's article).
To me, this is the most valuable type of search. Indeed, handbooks and
tables in electronic form are, in principle, much more valuable than
hardcopy.
For example, suppose you want to find all formulas involving doubly
infinite sums at http://functions.wolfram.com. Just click on the
"Formula Search" tab and enter
Sum[_,{_,-Infinity,Infinity}]
into the Mathematica patterns field.
Cheers,
Paul
_______________________________________________________________________
Paul Abbott Phone: 61 8 6488 2734
School of Physics, M013 Fax: +61 8 6488 1014
The University of Western Australia (CRICOS Provider No 00126G)
AUSTRALIA http://physics.uwa.edu.au/~paul
Prev by Date:
Re: Types in Mathematica
Next by Date:
Re: Built-In fuctions redefined---How?
Previous by thread:
Re: Hardcopy or electronic books?
Next by thread:
Random Normal deviates within compiled function?
|