Mathematica 9 is now available
Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums
-----
 /
MathGroup Archive
2005
*January
*February
*March
*April
*May
*June
*July
*August
*September
*October
*November
*December
*Archive Index
*Ask about this page
*Print this page
*Give us feedback
*Sign up for the Wolfram Insider

MathGroup Archive 2005

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: mole units

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg60943] Re: [mg60876] mole units
  • From: "Jose Luis Gomez" <jose.luis.gomez at itesm.mx>
  • Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2005 04:16:45 -0400 (EDT)
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

Hi Chris, as far as I remember, it is CORRECT that Mole is adimensional,
saying "a Mole of atoms" is similar to saying "a dozen of atoms", a Mole is
a very important number in Chemistry, but you could say "a Mole of cars", or
"a Mole of computers", just like you can say "a dozen of computers". The
difference is that "dozen" is a useful number in every-day life and "Mole"
is a useful number in Chemistry. 

Regards!
José Luis
http://homepage.cem.itesm.mx/lgomez/
 

-----Mensaje original-----
De: Chris Chiasson [mailto:chris.chiasson at gmail.com] 
Enviado el: Sábado, 01 de Octubre de 2005 01:56 a.m.
Para: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
Asunto: [mg60876] mole units

Hey all, remember that thread about making a FundamentalSI function?
Well, I was using it and noticed that it had taken away the Mole
"unit" from some of my equations. I then tried:
Convert[Mole,1]
Interestingly, the result is a number (a special one, obviously), not
an error. Mathematica is essentially treating mols as dimensionless
numbers, like Milli Kilo, etc. Personally, I think this behavior is
bad. What do you think?
--
Chris Chiasson
http://chrischiasson.com/contact/chris_chiasson


  • Prev by Date: Re: the faster way to find repeated sublists
  • Next by Date: Re: Dynamically defined URL
  • Previous by thread: Re: mole units
  • Next by thread: Re: Re: mole units