|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: mole units
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg60897] Re: [mg60876] mole units
- From: Yasvir Tesiram <tesiramy at omrf.ouhsc.edu>
- Date: Sun, 2 Oct 2005 01:54:48 -0400 (EDT)
- References: <200510010655.CAA13162@smc.vnet.net>
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
G'day,
Looks like its defined as Avogadros number of Molecules. What's the
problem?
Yas
On Sat, 1 Oct 2005, Chris Chiasson wrote:
> Hey all, remember that thread about making a FundamentalSI function?
> Well, I was using it and noticed that it had taken away the Mole
> "unit" from some of my equations. I then tried:
> Convert[Mole,1]
> Interestingly, the result is a number (a special one, obviously), not
> an error. Mathematica is essentially treating mols as dimensionless
> numbers, like Milli Kilo, etc. Personally, I think this behavior is
> bad. What do you think?
> --
> Chris Chiasson
> http://chrischiasson.com/contact/chris_chiasson
>
- References:
- mole units
- From: Chris Chiasson <chris.chiasson@gmail.com>
Prev by Date:
Re: Finding length in recursive definition?
Next by Date:
Re: Minimizing an integer value function
Previous by thread:
mole units
Next by thread:
Re: mole units
|