Mathematica 9 is now available
Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums
-----
 /
MathGroup Archive
2005
*January
*February
*March
*April
*May
*June
*July
*August
*September
*October
*November
*December
*Archive Index
*Ask about this page
*Print this page
*Give us feedback
*Sign up for the Wolfram Insider

MathGroup Archive 2005

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Argument checking while allowing specific assignments

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg61220] Re: Argument checking while allowing specific assignments
  • From: "Jens-Peer Kuska" <kuska at informatik.uni-leipzig.de>
  • Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 01:39:30 -0400 (EDT)
  • Organization: Uni Leipzig
  • References: <difudn$h0p$1@smc.vnet.net><dig4br$lp7$1@smc.vnet.net> <dii8jn$9bh$1@smc.vnet.net>
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

Hi,

the manual say that Mathematica automatical try to arrage
the order of the rules in a way that more specific
rules apply first. In many cases this works perfect.
But it depend on the ruels you are plan to add.

Regards
  Jens

"Ofek Shilon" <ofek at simbionix.com> schrieb im 
Newsbeitrag news:dii8jn$9bh$1 at smc.vnet.net...
| Thanks Jens,  but -
| my problem is that i wish to setup the function 
definitions beforehand
| and THEN allow the user to setup his own 
specific definitions, so i
| can't count on the rules' storage order. maybe 
some expansion of your
| approach can handle this?
| 



  • Prev by Date: big integer for Range
  • Next by Date: Re: NET/Link return array from C++
  • Previous by thread: Re: Argument checking while allowing specific assignments
  • Next by thread: Mathematica GuideBooks for Numerics and Symbolics published