MathGroup Archive 2005

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: inconsistency with Inequality testing and Floor

In article <dfbf58$iom$1 at>,
 Andrzej Kozlowski <andrzej at> wrote:

> And by the way, while  
> writing a review of Hans Stetter's "Numerical Polynomial Algebra", I  
> have found that  Mathematica's significance arithmetic with its  
> automatic precision tracking performs performs very well when  
> combined with   backward error based techniques that Stetter uses; in  
> fact quite a lot better than the other well known systems he was  
> using. I could even send you some examples of Matheamtica's  
> superiority but in view of the countless disputes on this topic that  
> you have initiated and that never get anywhere,   I think it would be  
> pointless. If you are interested you can read my review when it  
> appears in Math Reviews as actually discusses Mathematica's numerics.

This review may be of interest to readers of The Mathematica Journal. 
Perhaps a short discussion of this topic should appear in TMJ?


Paul Abbott                                      Phone:  61 8 6488 2734
School of Physics, M013                            Fax: +61 8 6488 1014
The University of Western Australia         (CRICOS Provider No 00126G)    

  • Prev by Date: Re: piecewise vs which
  • Next by Date: Re:numerical-symbolic Groebner basis
  • Previous by thread: Re:numerical-symbolic Groebner basis
  • Next by thread: Re: inconsistency with Inequality testing and Floor