|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: inconsistency with Inequality testing and Floor
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg60178] Re: inconsistency with Inequality testing and Floor
- From: Paul Abbott <paul at physics.uwa.edu.au>
- Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2005 01:26:49 -0400 (EDT)
- Organization: The University of Western Australia
- References: <200508251034.GAA10208@smc.vnet.net> <demmfd$rf1$1@smc.vnet.net> <200509010613.CAA08855@smc.vnet.net> <dfbf58$iom$1@smc.vnet.net>
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
In article <dfbf58$iom$1 at smc.vnet.net>,
Andrzej Kozlowski <andrzej at akikoz.net> wrote:
> And by the way, while
> writing a review of Hans Stetter's "Numerical Polynomial Algebra", I
> have found that Mathematica's significance arithmetic with its
> automatic precision tracking performs performs very well when
> combined with backward error based techniques that Stetter uses; in
> fact quite a lot better than the other well known systems he was
> using. I could even send you some examples of Matheamtica's
> superiority but in view of the countless disputes on this topic that
> you have initiated and that never get anywhere, I think it would be
> pointless. If you are interested you can read my review when it
> appears in Math Reviews as actually discusses Mathematica's numerics.
This review may be of interest to readers of The Mathematica Journal.
Perhaps a short discussion of this topic should appear in TMJ?
Cheers,
Paul
_______________________________________________________________________
Paul Abbott Phone: 61 8 6488 2734
School of Physics, M013 Fax: +61 8 6488 1014
The University of Western Australia (CRICOS Provider No 00126G)
AUSTRALIA http://physics.uwa.edu.au/~paul
Prev by Date:
Re: piecewise vs which
Next by Date:
Re:numerical-symbolic Groebner basis
Previous by thread:
Re:numerical-symbolic Groebner basis
Next by thread:
Re: inconsistency with Inequality testing and Floor
|