Mathematica 9 is now available
Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums
-----
 /
MathGroup Archive
2005
*January
*February
*March
*April
*May
*June
*July
*August
*September
*October
*November
*December
*Archive Index
*Ask about this page
*Print this page
*Give us feedback
*Sign up for the Wolfram Insider

MathGroup Archive 2005

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Re: Hardware question

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg60383] Re: [mg60317] Re: Hardware question
  • From: Manuel Schmidt <Manuel.Schmidt at physik.uni-wuerzburg.de>
  • Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 05:26:36 -0400 (EDT)
  • References: <dfp4ca$icf$1@smc.vnet.net> <dfrg7q$fol$1@smc.vnet.net> <200509131006.GAA09651@smc.vnet.net>
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

> How long--and how wide :-)
> 
> I have the fastest AMD chip in existence, the FX-55 (unless the FX-57
> is now available), but I couldn't find a mother board that could take
> more than 4GB of RAM.  (And if I put that much in, it would only see
> 3GB of it--a limitation of the bridge chip.)
> 
> Also, does even Linux x86-64 allow 8GB without tweaking?
> 
> --Ron Bruck

I thought, it is no problem, to adress as much memory as you want with
64Bit (about 10^10GByte) and the kernel configuration says, that iommu
(whatever this is) is needed to use more than 4GB of RAM.

By the way: We ordered a dual opteron system with 12GB RAM (max. 16GB)
with a Tyan Board. The Sun Workstations were too expensive (but thank's
for the reply anyway). I will send in some benchmarks, when we are up.

Thank you all for reply!

Manuel


  • Prev by Date: Other Way than Print[] for Intermediate Results
  • Next by Date: Re: Re: Hardware question
  • Previous by thread: Re: Re: Hardware question
  • Next by thread: Re: Re: Hardware question