Re: Maintenance of precision in NIntegrate
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg60516] Re: [mg60504] Maintenance of precision in NIntegrate
- From: Murray Eisenberg <murray at math.umass.edu>
- Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 04:45:36 -0400 (EDT)
- Organization: Mathematics & Statistics, Univ. of Mass./Amherst
- References: <200509180516.BAA02315@smc.vnet.net>
- Reply-to: murray at math.umass.edu
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
You may want to set option WorkingPrecision as well.
> Consider integrating a function arg with a stated PrecisionGoal, say 10:
> NIntegrate[arg[x], PrecisionGoal->10, ...]
> The integrand arg[x] is a numerical function of the form:
> arg[x] := (bunch of elementary functions) + NIntegrate[arg2[y],...]
> arg2[y] is, at best, computable to MachinePrecision.
> However, I don't know the best choices for
> PrecisionGoal or related options for the second integral (the inside
> in order to minimize my computation runtime. So, let's assume I do not use
> these options at all in the inside integral.
> My question: will Mathematica then automatically request the inside
> integral to perform at a high enough PrecisionGoal in order to
> meet my PrecisionGoal target of 10 in the first (outside) integral?
Murray Eisenberg murray at math.umass.edu
Mathematics & Statistics Dept.
Lederle Graduate Research Tower phone 413 549-1020 (H)
University of Massachusetts 413 545-2859 (W)
710 North Pleasant Street fax 413 545-1801
Amherst, MA 01003-9305
Prev by Date:
Re: Outputting MatrixForm to Word
Next by Date:
Re: Extracting coefficients for sinusoidals
Previous by thread:
Maintenance of precision in NIntegrate
Next by thread:
NonlinearFit-Logistic Function-CalcCenter 3