[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Maintenance of precision in NIntegrate

• To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
• Subject: [mg60504] Maintenance of precision in NIntegrate
• From: "Alan" <info at optioncity.REMOVETHIS.net>
• Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 01:16:00 -0400 (EDT)
• Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

Consider integrating a function arg[] with a stated PrecisionGoal, say 10:

NIntegrate[arg[x], PrecisionGoal->10, ...]

The integrand arg[x] is a numerical function of the form:

arg[x] := (bunch of elementary functions) + NIntegrate[arg2[y],...]

arg2[y] is, at best, computable to MachinePrecision.

However, I don't know the best choices for
PrecisionGoal or related options for the second integral (the inside 
integral)
in order to minimize my computation runtime. So, let's assume I do not use
these options at all in the inside integral.

My question: will Mathematica then automatically request the inside
integral to perform at a high enough PrecisionGoal in order to
meet my PrecisionGoal target of 10 in the first (outside) integral?

Thanks,
alan

 

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Maintenance of precision in NIntegrate
    • From: Murray Eisenberg <murray@math.umass.edu>