Re: Struggling with LaTeX output from Publicon

*To*: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net*Subject*: [mg60634] Re: [mg60592] Struggling with LaTeX output from Publicon*From*: <bsyehuda at gmail.com>*Date*: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 05:42:21 -0400 (EDT)*References*: <200509210720.DAA08079@smc.vnet.net>*Reply-to*: bsyehuda at gmail.com*Sender*: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

Hi, I tested publicon (evaluation version) for several days (few months ago) and 1. yes, in the style file 2. Default latex style does not have Theorem inside. I recommend that you use the AMSLaTeX style instead, it has all you need for theorem lemma, proof etc. This works prefectly well I decided on purchasing Publicon but I wait for the next 1.1 release (should be shortly) yehuda On 9/21/05, Kjell Tangen <kjarild at hotmail.com> wrote: > > I am struggling with the LaTeX output from Publicon. I am currently > running > 1.0.1. My questions are: > 1.. When saving my Publicon notebook as LaTeX, I get > \wolframcharacter{square} when I use the d'Alembert operator (\Box in > LaTeX). Is it possible to insert a conversion rule somewhere to convert it > to the proper \Box tag? > 2.. I would like to write automatically numbered theorems in my Publicon > document. In LaTeX it there should initially be a > \newtheorem{theorem}{Theorem} statement. Then, each theorem should be like > this in LaTeX: > \begin{theorem} Theorem text....\end{theorem}. Are there any ways to > accomplish this? > I like the authoring part of Publicon a lot, but it is frustrating to work > with the LaTeX output, since it is so immature. Any hope for a new release > that will improve the LaTeX output? > > I appreciate any help on this, > > with regards, > Kjell Tangen > > >

**References**:**Struggling with LaTeX output from Publicon***From:*"Kjell Tangen" <kjarild@hotmail.com>