Re: Struggling with LaTeX output from Publicon

*To*: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net*Subject*: [mg60822] Re: Struggling with LaTeX output from Publicon*From*: andre at wolfram.com*Date*: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 05:42:13 -0400 (EDT)*References*: <dgr2sa$8b2$1@smc.vnet.net>*Sender*: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

As mentioned by another responder, you should use the AMSLaTeX style for enunciations such as Theorem, Lemma etc. They are structured as you describe. You can customize any style sheets and palettes to mix and match various elements like these, if you are exporting to a different LaTeX class not supported by Publicon "out of the box". See the Custom Modules documentation in the help browser, along with Customizing LaTeX Output in the Advanced Features documentation. As for \Box, we defer to AMSTeX and generate \square instead, which should appear identical. The \[EmptySquare] character in Publicon will produce this output, whereas \[Square] is currently regarded as a Wolfram-specific character. I see no reason to maintain this distinction, so we've changed the underlying code for \[Square] to beget \square, as it seems obvious it should. This correction will appear in 1.1, which is in development as our next release. There are also character-specific conversion methods for getting \Box if you really want it. Search on Custom Character Conversions in the help browser Go To field in the User Guide to find a discussion of one localized method. AK ------------------------------------------------------------ Andre Kuzniarek Document Technology Manager Wolfram Research http://www.publicon.com