Re: Re: Bugs in Mathematica 5+

*To*: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net*Subject*: [mg60679] Re: [mg60652] Re: Bugs in Mathematica 5+*From*: Andrzej Kozlowski <akoz at mimuw.edu.pl>*Date*: Sat, 24 Sep 2005 02:55:24 -0400 (EDT)*References*: <200509230819.EAA26495@smc.vnet.net>*Sender*: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

On 23 Sep 2005, at 17:19, ROBO Design wrote: > Yes, I didn't give too much details, it would have been futile ;). > > And as for the bugs I mentioned... I'm sure that most of the > Mathematica 5 users who don't do only research, found all of them. > At least... I've encountered them in my first 2 hours of work with > it. And, further more, I can reproduce them at any second and any > time of day - this application is the most buggy one I'm using. > > Yet, it is imperative to use it, because it is the only one that > fits my needs. And... it is awesome. > > There are certainly lots of bugs in Mathematica though it is my impression that there are probably fewer than it its best known competitor (although I have to confess I have not tried a very recent version). But the number of actual bugs in Mathematica is only a small fraction of the number of imaginary bugs that exist in the minds of inexperienced users (you can confirm it by searching for the word "bug' in the archives of the MathGroup). So just to be sure I think it might be a good idea to post some of the bugs or perhaps "bugs' that you have found. Andrzej Kozlowski

**References**:**Re: Bugs in Mathematica 5+***From:*ROBO Design <robodesign@gmail.com>