Re: x=2;Composition[f,FindMinimum][x+1,{x,a}]

• To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
• Subject: [mg68302] Re: x=2;Composition[f,FindMinimum][x+1,{x,a}]
• From: Jean-Marc Gulliet <jeanmarc.gulliet at gmail.com>
• Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 06:59:15 -0400 (EDT)
• Organization: The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK
• References: <eake8e\$qu9\$1@smc.vnet.net>
• Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

```Chris Chiasson wrote:
> The above command crashes my kernel on Windows XP and Linux. Anybody else?
>
x = 2; Composition[f, FindMinimum][x + 1, {x, a}]

The above one crashes the kernel too. Now, you would not get any result
whatsoever, since this is "a" that must be set, not "x".

x = 2; Composition[FindMinimum][x + 1, {x, a}]
FindMinimum::"srect" : "Value (a) in search specification ({x, a}) is
not a number or array of numbers.
FindMinimum[x + 1, {x, a}]

This works better,

a = 2; Composition[f, FindMinimum][x + 1, {x, a}]

FindMinimum::"lstol" : "The line search decreased the step size to
within tolerance specified by AccuracyGoal and PrecisionGoal but was
unable to find a sufficient decrease in the function. You may need more
than (MachinePrecision) digits of working precision to meet these
tolerances.

f[{-1.1012745173913992*^16, {x -> -1.1012745173913992*^16}}]

HTH,
Jean-Marc

```

• Prev by Date: Re: Using implicit information about row indices
• Next by Date: Re: need to make a special function
• Previous by thread: Re: x=2;Composition[f,FindMinimum][x+1,{x,a}]
• Next by thread: Re: x=2;Composition[f,FindMinimum][x+1,{x,a}]