Re: Re: Using implicit information about row indices
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg68363] Re: [mg68321] Re: [mg68254] Using implicit information about row indices
- From: János <janos.lobb at yale.edu>
- Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 05:24:32 -0400 (EDT)
- References: <200607310745.DAA26729@smc.vnet.net> <200608011059.GAA09926@smc.vnet.net> <FFE36A7B-ACFB-4B16-ABE4-10001E419F4A@mimuw.edu.pl>
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
On Aug 1, 2006, at 10:54 AM, Andrzej Kozlowski wrote: > > On 1 Aug 2006, at 12:59, János wrote: > >> Here is a newbie approach: > > There is a question I have wanted to ask for some time ;-) > Is there a limit to how long one is allowed to call oneself a > "newbie"? > > Andrzej Kozlowski Well, In Hungary we used to tell: "For a newborn every joke is a new joke". I can read it in reverse: "Every new joke makes a born a newborn". So as long as I see the posted problems as new problems, I think I "entitled" to use the phrase "newbie approach". /Not counting that with every found solution - hopefully - some new neurons were created in my brain, that again makes me a "newbie" :)/ On the other side I am using Mathematica just in the last two years and that is a miniscule time compared to other contributors of this list. Last, when my analysis professor - Dr. Zoltán Daróczy - kicked me out from an exam where he asked me about Lipót Fejér's proof and I told him Weierstrass second proof....., I knew immediately that I will be a newbie at any time when it comes to mathematics :) János -------- "At a risk of being called sexist, ageist and French, if you put multimedia, a leather skirt and lipstick on a grandmother and take her to a night club, she's still not going to get lucky." -- Jean Louis Gassee (of Be) on Windows 2000 being "multimedia."
- References:
- Re: Using implicit information about row indices
- From: János <janos.lobb@yale.edu>
- Re: Using implicit information about row indices