Re: Finding the Number of Pythagorean Triples below a bound
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg68409] Re: Finding the Number of Pythagorean Triples below a bound
- From: titus_piezas at yahoo.com
- Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 03:59:22 -0400 (EDT)
- References: <eaeqa3$53v$1@smc.vnet.net><eakfgm$rl6$1@smc.vnet.net> <200608020923.FAA28520@smc.vnet.net> <79C36C70-E091-4A82-8EC5-0EDC743D081D@mimuw.edu.pl> <easiva$fp3$1@smc.vnet.net>
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
Hello Andrzej, The code I used was this: c1=Sqrt[N[a^2+b^2-k]]; countTriples[m_]:=Block[{a,b,i=0},For[a=1,a<(10^m/Sqrt[2]),a++, For[b=a,b<10^m,b++,If[c1==Round[c1]&&c1<10^m,i++]]];i] though m=3 takes about 50 sec (in an old comp) while m=4 will prolly be around 5000 sec (83 mins). -Titus
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Re: Finding the Number of Pythagorean Triples below a bound
- From: Andrzej Kozlowski <akoz@mimuw.edu.pl>
- Re: Re: Finding the Number of Pythagorean Triples below a bound
- References:
- Re: Finding the Number of Pythagorean Triples below a bound
- From: titus_piezas@yahoo.com
- Re: Finding the Number of Pythagorean Triples below a bound