Re: using answer form reduce

*To*: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net*Subject*: [mg68636] Re: using answer form reduce*From*: "akil" <akomur at wanadoo.nl>*Date*: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 06:44:07 -0400 (EDT)*References*: <ebmtf5$6fb$1@smc.vnet.net>*Sender*: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

Thanks All, ToRules did the trick. I don't know why Reduce just does not include an link to the section where they explain ToRules, because an example using Reduce is shown there, as i saw after all the advice I got. Akil "akil" <akomur at wanadoo.nl> schreef in bericht news:ebmtf5$6fb$1 at smc.vnet.net... > After using reduce I get the following two types of answers: > > answer == Real1 || answer == Real2 > or > answer == Real3 > , the type can change from one formula to another. > > I need the Reals, and put them all in a list. The problem is getting all > the > reals, without knowing which type I deal with, it should be able to be > done > fast. > > I tried making a list of the returned adres, and then using > Cases[list, _Real, Infinity] and using Select[list,NumericQ] but both do > not > give me the answer I require. > > How can I get the answer I require e.g. something like {Real1,Real2,Real3} > > >

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: Re: using answer form reduce***From:*"Chris Chiasson" <chris@chiasson.name>