[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Re: using answer form reduce

• To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
• Subject: [mg68636] Re: using answer form reduce
• From: "akil" <akomur at wanadoo.nl>
• Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 06:44:07 -0400 (EDT)
• References: <ebmtf5$6fb$1@smc.vnet.net>
• Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

Thanks All,

 ToRules did the trick.

I don't know why Reduce just does not include an link to the section where 
they explain ToRules, because an example using Reduce is shown there, as i 
saw after all the advice I got.

Akil

"akil" <akomur at wanadoo.nl> schreef in bericht 
news:ebmtf5$6fb$1 at smc.vnet.net...
> After using reduce I get the following two types of answers:
>
> answer == Real1 || answer == Real2
> or
> answer == Real3
> , the type can change from one formula to another.
>
> I need the Reals, and put them all in a list. The problem is getting all 
> the
> reals, without knowing which type I deal with, it should be able to be 
> done
> fast.
>
> I tried making a list of the returned adres, and then using
> Cases[list, _Real, Infinity] and using Select[list,NumericQ] but both do 
> not
> give me the answer I require.
>
> How can I get the answer I require e.g. something like {Real1,Real2,Real3}
>
>
> 

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Re: using answer form reduce
    • From: "Chris Chiasson" <chris@chiasson.name>