Re: Re: using answer form reduce
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg68679] Re: [mg68636] Re: using answer form reduce
- From: "Chris Chiasson" <chris at chiasson.name>
- Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 03:36:10 -0400 (EDT)
- References: <ebmtf5$6fb$1@smc.vnet.net> <200608141044.GAA25301@smc.vnet.net>
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
The Mathematica system is so large - I am sure they have to be very vigilant to maintain their current level of cohesiveness and cross-referencing. If you send an email to technical support about it, you can probably persuade them to add a cross reference to ToRules to make things better for future users. On 8/14/06, akil <akomur at wanadoo.nl> wrote: > Thanks All, > > ToRules did the trick. > > I don't know why Reduce just does not include an link to the section where > they explain ToRules, because an example using Reduce is shown there, as i > saw after all the advice I got. > > Akil > > "akil" <akomur at wanadoo.nl> schreef in bericht > news:ebmtf5$6fb$1 at smc.vnet.net... > > After using reduce I get the following two types of answers: > > > > answer == Real1 || answer == Real2 > > or > > answer == Real3 > > , the type can change from one formula to another. > > > > I need the Reals, and put them all in a list. The problem is getting all > > the > > reals, without knowing which type I deal with, it should be able to be > > done > > fast. > > > > I tried making a list of the returned adres, and then using > > Cases[list, _Real, Infinity] and using Select[list,NumericQ] but both do > > not > > give me the answer I require. > > > > How can I get the answer I require e.g. something like {Real1,Real2,Real3} > > > > > > > > > -- http://chris.chiasson.name/
- References:
- Re: using answer form reduce
- From: "akil" <akomur@wanadoo.nl>
- Re: using answer form reduce