MathGroup Archive 2006

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Re: using answer form reduce


The Mathematica system is so large - I am sure they have to be very vigilant
to maintain their current level of cohesiveness and cross-referencing.
If you send an email to technical support about it, you can probably
persuade them to add a cross reference to ToRules to make things
better for future users.

On 8/14/06, akil <akomur at wanadoo.nl> wrote:
> Thanks All,
>
>  ToRules did the trick.
>
> I don't know why Reduce just does not include an link to the section where
> they explain ToRules, because an example using Reduce is shown there, as i
> saw after all the advice I got.
>
> Akil
>
> "akil" <akomur at wanadoo.nl> schreef in bericht
> news:ebmtf5$6fb$1 at smc.vnet.net...
> > After using reduce I get the following two types of answers:
> >
> > answer == Real1 || answer == Real2
> > or
> > answer == Real3
> > , the type can change from one formula to another.
> >
> > I need the Reals, and put them all in a list. The problem is getting all
> > the
> > reals, without knowing which type I deal with, it should be able to be
> > done
> > fast.
> >
> > I tried making a list of the returned adres, and then using
> > Cases[list, _Real, Infinity] and using Select[list,NumericQ] but both do
> > not
> > give me the answer I require.
> >
> > How can I get the answer I require e.g. something like {Real1,Real2,Real3}
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>


-- 
http://chris.chiasson.name/


  • Prev by Date: Re: benchmark...why don't you send it back?
  • Next by Date: Re: simple question
  • Previous by thread: Re: using answer form reduce
  • Next by thread: Re: using answer form reduce