Mathematica 9 is now available
Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums
-----
 /
MathGroup Archive
2006
*January
*February
*March
*April
*May
*June
*July
*August
*September
*October
*November
*December
*Archive Index
*Ask about this page
*Print this page
*Give us feedback
*Sign up for the Wolfram Insider

MathGroup Archive 2006

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

RE: perplexed by blank sequence in pattern replacement

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg68694] RE: [mg68674] perplexed by blank sequence in pattern replacement
  • From: "David Park" <djmp at earthlink.net>
  • Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 04:17:52 -0400 (EDT)
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

Blake,

It is because the rule is evaluated on the lhs so it becomes:

Times[mysequence__] -> {mysequence}
mysequence__ -> {mysequence}

mysequence__ matches a*b*c so a*b*c is put into brackets to give {a*b*c}.

This is not an uncommon problem and the solution is to use HoldPattern.

Replace[a*b*c, HoldPattern[Times[mysequence__]] :> {mysequence}]
{a, b, c}

You could also use

a b c /. HoldPattern[Times[mysequence__]] -> {mysequence}
{a, b, c}

David Park
djmp at earthlink.net
http://home.earthlink.net/~djmp/ 

From: Blake [mailto:laing at ou.edu]
To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net


Dear MathGroup:

I have been blithely using blank sequences in pattern matching for some
time. In persuit of a bug in a package of mine, I was quite alarmed to
find that I don't really understand how to use the blank sequence, as
expressed in the following simplified example:

In[1]:=Replace[a*b*c,Times[mysequence__]:>{mysequence}]

Out[1]={a b c}

I expected Out[1]={a,b,c}, from a naieve reading of the full form of
a*b*c

In[2]:=FullForm[a*b*c]

Out[2]//FullForm=Times[a,b,c]

Will someone PLEASE tell me why In[1] does not yield the results I
expected? (I can readily use a work-around, what I am concerned with is
a correct understanding of pattern matching).

Blake Laing
thesis slave
University of Oklahoma



  • Prev by Date: Re: distance function
  • Next by Date: Re: namespace collision [bug]
  • Previous by thread: Re: perplexed by blank sequence in pattern replacement
  • Next by thread: Re: perplexed by blank sequence in pattern replacement