Re: benchmark...why don't you send it back?

*To*: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net*Subject*: [mg68853] Re: benchmark...why don't you send it back?*From*: Jean-Marc Gulliet <jeanmarc.gulliet at gmail.com>*Date*: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 03:28:04 -0400 (EDT)*Organization*: The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK*References*: <ebhisr$178$1@smc.vnet.net>*Sender*: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

p-valko at tamu.edu wrote: > I find it increasingly frustrating that there is not enough data on > benchmark timing for Mathematica 5.2, though the benchmark is built in. > > So why don't you copy these lines to a new notebook on your computer; > run it and copy the result (only the last cell) into your reply to this > posting? (You may want to make changes to variable bm2 as appropriate.) > > Needs["Utilities`Benchmark`"] > bm1 = Benchmark[] /. InputForm -> Identity; > bm2 = { > "Processor" -> "Pentium IV 3 GHz", > "Memory" -> "2 G", > "Operating System" -> "Windows XP professional, SP 2", > "$Slaves" -> $Slaves > }; > Join[bm1,bm2] { "MachineName"->"wizard-of-oz", "System"->"Microsoft Windows", "BenchmarkName"->"MathematicaMark5.2", "FullVersionNumber"->"5.2.0", "Date"->"August 19, 2006", "BenchmarkResult"->1.147`, "TotalTime"->80.979`, "Results"-> { { "Data Fitting",3.5`}, { "Digits of Pi",3.5`}, { "Discrete Fourier Transform",4.579`}, { "Eigenvalues of a Matrix",7.702`}, { "Elementary Functions",6.093`}, { "Gamma Function",3.5`}, { "Large Integer Multiplication",3.624`}, { "Matrix Exponential",4.875`}, { "Matrix Multiplication",8.157`}, { "Matrix Transpose",5.936`}, { "Numerical Integration",4.938`}, { "Polynomial Expansion",4.546`}, { "Random Number Sort",4.467`}, { "Singular Value Decomposition",6.984`}, { "Solving a Linear System",8.578`}}, "Processor"->"Pentium IV-HT 2.6 GHz", "Memory"->"1 G", "Operating System"->"Windows XP professional, SP 2", "$Slaves"->$Slaves} Regards, Jean-Marc