Re: benchmark...why don't you send it back?
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg68853] Re: benchmark...why don't you send it back?
- From: Jean-Marc Gulliet <jeanmarc.gulliet at gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 03:28:04 -0400 (EDT)
- Organization: The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK
- References: <ebhisr$178$1@smc.vnet.net>
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
p-valko at tamu.edu wrote:
> I find it increasingly frustrating that there is not enough data on
> benchmark timing for Mathematica 5.2, though the benchmark is built in.
>
> So why don't you copy these lines to a new notebook on your computer;
> run it and copy the result (only the last cell) into your reply to this
> posting? (You may want to make changes to variable bm2 as appropriate.)
>
> Needs["Utilities`Benchmark`"]
> bm1 = Benchmark[] /. InputForm -> Identity;
> bm2 = {
> "Processor" -> "Pentium IV 3 GHz",
> "Memory" -> "2 G",
> "Operating System" -> "Windows XP professional, SP 2",
> "$Slaves" -> $Slaves
> };
> Join[bm1,bm2]
{ "MachineName"->"wizard-of-oz", "System"->"Microsoft Windows",
"BenchmarkName"->"MathematicaMark5.2", "FullVersionNumber"->"5.2.0",
"Date"->"August 19, 2006", "BenchmarkResult"->1.147`,
"TotalTime"->80.979`, "Results"-> { { "Data Fitting",3.5`}, { "Digits of
Pi",3.5`}, { "Discrete Fourier Transform",4.579`}, { "Eigenvalues of a
Matrix",7.702`}, { "Elementary Functions",6.093`}, { "Gamma
Function",3.5`}, { "Large Integer Multiplication",3.624`}, { "Matrix
Exponential",4.875`}, { "Matrix Multiplication",8.157`}, { "Matrix
Transpose",5.936`}, { "Numerical Integration",4.938`}, { "Polynomial
Expansion",4.546`}, { "Random Number Sort",4.467`}, { "Singular Value
Decomposition",6.984`}, { "Solving a Linear System",8.578`}},
"Processor"->"Pentium IV-HT 2.6 GHz", "Memory"->"1 G", "Operating
System"->"Windows XP professional, SP 2", "$Slaves"->$Slaves}
Regards,
Jean-Marc