|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Is -1^(2/5) really undefined in R?
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg69136] Re: Is -1^(2/5) really undefined in R?
- From: dh <dh at metrohm.ch>
- Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 06:36:19 -0400 (EDT)
- References: <ed0uvq$po$1@smc.vnet.net>
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
version= Mathematica 5.1, Windows
Hi Ben,
There are actually five values of -1^(2/5), one of which is real.
Consider -1=Exp[I (Pi + 2 n Pi)]. Then -1^(2/5)=Exp[2/5 I(I Pi + 2 n Pi)]
Well, which value will mathematica return. You can find the answer in
the manual under Power: "Power gives the principal value of a Exp[y
Log[x]]", this is unfortunately not 1 as you expected, but on of the
complex values.
Daniel
Ben wrote:
> Is -1^(2/5) really undefined in R?
>
> Mathematica seems to think so, I guess since it looks like a negative square root, but
>
> -1^(2/5) = (-1^2)^(1/5) = 1^(1/5) = 1
>
> Is this correct mathematically?
>
> cheers,
>
> BC
>
Prev by Date:
RE: Is -1^(2/5) really undefined in R?
Next by Date:
Re: random 3D object consisting of cuboids
Previous by thread:
RE: Is -1^(2/5) really undefined in R?
Next by thread:
Re: Is -1^(2/5) really undefined in R?
|