|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Is -1^(2/5) really undefined in R?
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg69160] Re: Is -1^(2/5) really undefined in R?
- From: Jean-Marc Gulliet <jeanmarc.gulliet at gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 04:39:30 -0400 (EDT)
- Organization: The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK
- References: <ed0uvq$po$1@smc.vnet.net> <ed3qqi$roj$1@smc.vnet.net>
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
Jean-Marc Gulliet wrote:
> Ben wrote:
>> Is -1^(2/5) really undefined in R?
>
> Yes.
Oops! Silly mistype of mine! Of course the line above should have read
"No" rather than "Yes". I apologize for any head-scratching...
Jean-Marc
>
>> Mathematica seems to think so, I guess since it looks like a negative square root, but
>>
>> -1^(2/5) = (-1^2)^(1/5) = 1^(1/5) = 1
>>
>> Is this correct mathematically?
>
> No. See "College Algebra Tutorial 5: Rational Exponents" at
> http://www.wtamu.edu/academic/anns/mps/math/mathlab/col_algebra/col_alg_tut5_ratexp.htm
>
> In[12]:=
> ((-1)^(1/5))^2
>
> Out[12]=
> 2/5
> (-1)
>
> In[13]:=
> (-1)^(2/5)==((-1)^(1/5))^2
>
> Out[13]=
> True
>
> (-1)^(2/5)==((-1)^2)^(1/5)
>
> Out[14]=
> False
>
> HTH,
> Jean-Marc
>
Prev by Date:
RE: transforming a rule of lists to a list of rules
Next by Date:
Re: transforming a rule of lists to a list of rules
Previous by thread:
Re: Is -1^(2/5) really undefined in R?
Next by thread:
one-dimensional and two-dimensional convolution
|