Mathematica 9 is now available
Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums
-----
 /
MathGroup Archive
2006
*January
*February
*March
*April
*May
*June
*July
*August
*September
*October
*November
*December
*Archive Index
*Ask about this page
*Print this page
*Give us feedback
*Sign up for the Wolfram Insider

MathGroup Archive 2006

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Re: General--Exponential simplifications by default


The statement about FullForm you are quoting is "true", at best, only  
in a "certain sense":
  FullForm does "not affect" evaluation "inside" FullForm, as in:

FullForm[2^2]//InputForm

FullForm[4]

But of course it does affect evaluation "outside" FullForm, as in:


FullForm[2]^2//InputForm


FullForm[2]^2

This is the reason why you also get:


{Numerator[#],Denominator[#]}&@FullForm[2/3]//InputForm


{FullForm[2/3], 1}

which I think makes pretty clear what happened also in your example.

Andrzej Kozlowski



On 29 Aug 2006, at 08:26, p-valko at tamu.edu wrote:

> Thanks and basically I agree. However, a funny side effect is the
> following:
>
> Denominator[Exp[x] /. x -> -2 ]
> gives
> E^2
>
> but
>
> Denominator[FullForm[Exp[x]] /. x -> -2 ]
> gives
> 1
>
> In other words, wrapping the FullForm around an expression changes its
> "meaning".
> This contradicts the statement that
>>> FullForm acts as a "wrapper", which affects printing, but not  
>>> evaluation.<<
> Or am I missing something?
>
>
>
> Andrzej Kozlowski wrote:
>> I do not consider any of these examples "a contradiction". What needs
>> to be understood is the difference between certain Mathematica
>> expressions before and after they are evaluated. In the case of your
>> examples consider:
>>
>>
>> Numerator[Unevaluated[Exp[-x]]]
>>
>> E^(-x)
>>
>> vs
>>
>> Numerator[Exp[-x]]
>>
>> 1
>>
>>
>> Numerator[Unevaluated[1/Sqrt[2]]]
>>
>> 1
>>
>> vs
>>
>> Numerator[1/Sqrt[2]]
>>
>> Sqrt[2]
>>
>> The cause of the apparent problem is that Numerator does not hold its
>> argument, so whiteout Unevaluated you are getting the numerator of
>> the whatever your expression evaluates to, not of your actual input.
>> TO get the latter you simply need to use Unevaluated.  This is no
>> different from:
>>
>>
>> Numerator[3/6]
>>
>> 1
>>
>> Numerator[Unevaluated[3/6]]
>>
>> 3
>>
>> If this is not a contradiction than neither are the other examples.
>> Understanding the process of evaluation is perhaps the most important
>> thing when using functional languages (not just Mathematica, the same
>> sort of things occur, perhaps in an even more striking way,  in
>> languages like Lisp ).
>>
>> Andrzej Kozlowski
>>
>>
>>
>> On 27 Aug 2006, at 07:24, p-valko at tamu.edu wrote:
>>
>>> Daniel,
>>> Could you tell me why the contradiction?:
>>>
>>> In[14]:=Exp[-x]//InputForm
>>> Out[14]//InputForm=E^(-x)
>>>
>>> In[15]:=Numerator[Exp[-x]]//InputForm
>>> Out[15]//InputForm=1
>>>
>>> Mathematica automatically turns it into Power[E, Times[-1, x]], but
>>> the user
>>> beleives that the exponent is in the numerator.
>>> What you see is not what you get!
>>>
>>>
>>> My favorite contradiction is the following:
>>>
>>> In[24]:=Numerator[1/Sqrt[2]]//InputForm
>>> Out[24]//InputForm=Sqrt[2]
>>>
>>> In[25]:=Denominator[1/Sqrt[2]]//InputForm
>>> Out[25]//InputForm=2
>>>
>>> I think "Numerator" and "Denominator" should not be allowed to do
>>> whatever they want. Too much liberty here...
>>>
>>> Peter
>>>
>>>
>>> Daniel Lichtblau wrote:
>>>> guillaume_evin at yahoo.fr wrote:
>>>>> Hi !
>>>>>
>>>>> I want to avoid simplifications when Mathematica integrates
>>>>> expressions with exponential terms. For example, I have :
>>>>>
>>>>> In[8]=      Espcond[y_] = Integrate[x*Densx[x, y], {x, 0,
>>>>> Infinity}, Assumptions -> alpha > 0]
>>>>> Out[8]=      E^(-2eta y)(-theta + E^(eta y)(2+theta))/(2alpha)
>>>>>
>>>>> I do not want to have a factorization by E^(-2eta y). More
>>>>> precisely I would like to have the following result:
>>>>> Out[8]=      (-theta E^(-2eta y)+ E^(-eta y)(2+theta))/(2alpha)
>>>>>
>>>>> I guess there is a way to tackle this problem with
>>>>> "ComplexityFunction" and "Simplify", but I tried different things
>>>>> such as "ComplexityFunction -> (Count[{#1}, Exp_, &#8734;] &)" in
>>>>> the "Simplify" function but no change appears.
>>>>>
>>>>> Is someone could give me some tricks on how tu use the
>>>>> "ComplexityFunction" ?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you in advance.
>>>>>
>>>>> Guillaume
>>>>>
>>>>> Link to the forum page for this post:
>>>>> http://www.mathematica-users.org/webMathematica/wiki/wiki.jsp?
>>>>> pageName=Special:Forum_ViewTopic&pid=12974#p12974
>>>>> Posted through http://www.mathematica-users.org [[postId=12974]]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Could Collect with respect to powers of the exponential.
>>>>
>>>> In[59]:= ee = E^(-2eta*y)*(-theta + E^(eta*y)(2+theta))/(2*alpha);
>>>>
>>>> In[60]:= InputForm[Collect[ee, Exp[eta*y]]]
>>>> Out[60]//InputForm=
>>>> -theta/(2*alpha*E^(2*eta*y)) + (2 + theta)/(2*alpha*E^(eta*y))
>>>>
>>>> Daniel Lichtblau
>>>> Wolfram Research
>>>
>


  • Prev by Date: Re: using FindRoot to find multiple answers in a domain?
  • Next by Date: Re: Re: change of default behavoir for workbench
  • Previous by thread: Re: General--Exponential simplifications by default
  • Next by thread: Re: General--Exponential simplifications by default