[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
RE: Problems with Set, SetDelayed and replacement rules...
*To*: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
*Subject*: [mg72292] RE: [mg72274] Problems with Set, SetDelayed and replacement rules...
*From*: "David Park" <djmp at earthlink.net>
*Date*: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 06:56:22 -0500 (EST)
Johannes,
I would write the definitions as follows, using SubValues to hold the
parameters for f.
f[g_, h_][x_] := g/h x
g[p_] = 1 + p;
h[p_] = 1 + p^2;
Then you could evaluate your function as follows.
f[g[p], h[p]][x]
((1 + p)*x)/(1 + p^2)
If you use a specific value for p then you might have
f[g[1], h[1]][x]
x
If you wanted you could also use...
params = {g -> g[p], h -> h[p]};
f[g, h][x] /. params /. p -> 1
x
Separating the parameters in the SubValues part of the definition, [g,h],
also allows you do differentiate and integrate with respect to x.
f[g,h]'[x]
g/h
f[g[3], h[3]]'[x]
2/5
Integrate[f[g, h][x], x]
(g*x^2)/(2*h)
Integrate[f[g[1], h[1]][x], x]
x^2/2
So one form of the expression should serve all your needs.
David Park
djmp at earthlink.net
http://home.earthlink.net/~djmp/
From: Johannes [mailto:ml.johannes at gmail.com]
Hi,
I am working a lot with physics equations where I have on the one hand
variables, and on the other hand paramters, which depend on other parameters
which are only given by a polynome.
In the following (very simplified example) f is a function which depends on
variable x and parameters g and h which depend both on parameter p:
f[x_]:= g/h*x;
g[p_]= 1+p;
h[p_]=1+p^2;
params={g->g[p],h->h[p]};
For numerical application, I would like to define a second function f with p
as second variable. This I have done with different methods, and there I
noticed a difference that I can't explain
f1[x_, p_] = f[x] /. params;
f2[x_, p_] := f[x] /. {g->g[p],h->h[p]};
f3[x_, p_] := f[x] /. params;
If I am now calculating f1[1,1], f2[1,1] and f3[1,1], f1 and f2 deliver as
expected a numerical value, but for f3[1,1] p isn't replaced by its value 1.
Can anybody explain me the differences, especially the differences between
f2 and f3? I suspected it to be exactly identical.
And does anybody know a better method to treat parameters? My problem is
that when doing analytical transformations (Derivatives, Integrations...),
an immediate replacement of the parameters g and h would make the result
very hard to read, so I was searching for an easy method to replace them as
late as possible.
Thanks in advance for any help,
Johannes
Prev by Date:
**Re: creating dirac bra-ket notations in Mathematica**
Next by Date:
**Re: Problems with Set, SetDelayed and replacement rules...**
Previous by thread:
**Re: Problems with Set, SetDelayed and replacement rules...**
Next by thread:
**Re: Problems with Set, SetDelayed and replacement rules...**
| |