Re: MathGL3d and Mathematica 5.3

*To*: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net*Subject*: [mg64260] Re: MathGL3d and Mathematica 5.3*From*: Ronald Bruck <bruck at math.usc.edu>*Date*: Wed, 8 Feb 2006 03:53:55 -0500 (EST)*References*: <200602060749.CAA08708@smc.vnet.net> <ds9nlb$bh$1@smc.vnet.net>*Sender*: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

(Top-posting because Murray did) Really? Wolfram is SELLING MathGL3D? This brings up the obvious question: how much more functional is their version than the original, FREE version, available at <http://phong.informatik.uni-leipzig.de/~kuska/mathgl3dv3/>? And is this why Kuska hasn't ever updated it for Mac OS? --Ron Bruck In article <ds9nlb$bh$1 at smc.vnet.net>, Murray Eisenberg <murray at math.umass.edu> wrote: > It seems unlikely that Wolfram would include THAT much functionality in > the next version of Mathematica. After all, it is now selling MathGL3d > as a 4d-party Application at a standard price of $450 and an educational > price of $300. > > I, for one, would sure hate to have the price of Mathematica itself go > up by anything like that much just in order to include the full > functionality of MathGL3d. > > > Mitch Murphy wrote: > > attention wolfram ... > > > > please include MathGL3d in Mathematica 5.3. i'm very disapointed that > > mathematica still does not have an integrated interactive 3d viewer > > after so many years.

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: Re: MathGL3d and Mathematica 5.3***From:*Murray Eisenberg <murray@math.umass.edu>

**References**:**MathGL3d and Mathematica 5.3***From:*Mitch Murphy <mitch@mix5.com>