Re: delayed rule evaluation order
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg67983] Re: [mg67967] delayed rule evaluation order
- From: "Chris Chiasson" <chris at chiasson.name>
- Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 06:04:16 -0400 (EDT)
- References: <200607190921.FAA21363@smc.vnet.net> <44BE2B26.70206@wolfram.com> <acbec1a40607190940k511a06b0ue9e47405a39fe651@mail.gmail.com> <44BE6CF2.6090605@wolfram.com> <acbec1a40607191107o7031451dif5f730d9bca4ded9@mail.gmail.com>
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
At the risk of making this thread even more long in the tooth, I would like to contradict my statement about PatternTest being the "culprit". PatternTest and appropriate Pattern objects are not mutually exclusive; it was my overly-general Pattern object, Blank[] (aka _ ), that caused the problems. If I have any more to add, I'll just append it to the MathGroup thread rather than using direct email.
- References:
- delayed rule evaluation order
- From: "Chris Chiasson" <chris@chiasson.name>
- delayed rule evaluation order