MathGroup Archive 2006

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: delayed rule evaluation order

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg67983] Re: [mg67967] delayed rule evaluation order
  • From: "Chris Chiasson" <chris at chiasson.name>
  • Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 06:04:16 -0400 (EDT)
  • References: <200607190921.FAA21363@smc.vnet.net> <44BE2B26.70206@wolfram.com> <acbec1a40607190940k511a06b0ue9e47405a39fe651@mail.gmail.com> <44BE6CF2.6090605@wolfram.com> <acbec1a40607191107o7031451dif5f730d9bca4ded9@mail.gmail.com>
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

At the risk of making this thread even more long in the tooth, I would
like to contradict my statement about PatternTest being the "culprit".
PatternTest and appropriate Pattern objects are not mutually
exclusive; it was my overly-general Pattern object, Blank[] (aka _ ),
that caused the problems.

If I have any more to add, I'll just append it to the MathGroup thread
rather than using direct email.


  • Prev by Date: DiscreteDelta and RSolve Bug?
  • Next by Date: Re: writing ASCII-files in UNIX-format from Windows
  • Previous by thread: delayed rule evaluation order
  • Next by thread: Re: delayed rule evaluation order