Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums
-----
 /
MathGroup Archive
2006
*January
*February
*March
*April
*May
*June
*July
*August
*September
*October
*November
*December
*Archive Index
*Ask about this page
*Print this page
*Give us feedback
*Sign up for the Wolfram Insider

MathGroup Archive 2006

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Mathematica doesn't know what it's doing.

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg67187] Re: Mathematica doesn't know what it's doing.
  • From: "Steven T. Hatton" <hattons at globalsymmetry.com>
  • Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2006 02:19:27 -0400 (EDT)
  • References: <e6e2ko$1vt$1@smc.vnet.net>
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

Here is an example where the Mathematica approach to document structure does
not correspond to what I want.  If I decide to use the section grouping
provided with style sheets to place theorems in the hierarchical structure
of my document then I cannot place theorems at arbitrary depth in the
document structure.  For example, suppose I decide that my document will
have chapters organized into sections, and then theorems will be treated as
subsections.  Now, what happens if I come to realize that the current
concept would be better treated as two subsections?  My theorems are not
part of the subsections, they become peers of them.
-- 
http://www.mathematica-users.org/
http://www.ifi.unizh.ch/math/bmwcs/master.html
http://www.w3.org/Math/
http://230nsc1.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/hframe.html


  • Prev by Date: Re: ? about Rule
  • Next by Date: Re: Simple question from a biologist
  • Previous by thread: Re: Mathematica doesn't know what it's doing.
  • Next by thread: Re: Mathematica doesn't know what it's doing.