[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Possible Bug in ArcTan ?
*To*: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
*Subject*: [mg64804] Re: Possible Bug in ArcTan ?
*From*: Paul Abbott <paul at physics.uwa.edu.au>
*Date*: Sat, 4 Mar 2006 02:35:15 -0500 (EST)
*Organization*: The University of Western Australia
*References*: <du6o44$5rg$1@smc.vnet.net> <du83m5$sv3$1@smc.vnet.net> <du8are$fp7$1@smc.vnet.net>
*Sender*: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
In article <du8are$fp7$1 at smc.vnet.net>,
"David W. Cantrell" <DWCantrell at sigmaxi.org> wrote:
> "Jens-Peer Kuska" <kuska at informatik.uni-leipzig.de> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > why can ArcTan[] have two arguments ArcTan[x,y]
>
> As the Help Browser says,
> "taking into account which quadrant the point (x,y) is in."
>
> For example, suppose you want to convert -2 + I to polar form,
> r*E^(I*theta). One can't simply say theta = ArcTan[1/-2]. The range of the
> single-argument ArcTan is [-Pi/2, Pi/2], i.e., fourth and first quadrants,
> while our point (-2, 1) is in the third quadrant. But we can conveniently
> say theta = ArcTan[-2, 1].
Or we can say theta = 2 ArcTan[1/(Sqrt[5]-2)] (see below).
> Note: Some other languages implement the two-argument form under the
> name ATAN2. Furthermore, the order of the two arguments is often backwards
> compared to Mathematica's, that is, ATAN2(y,x).
There is another way that avoids the two-argument form altogether. Using
the half-angle formula for tan,
Simplify[Tan[t/2] == Sin[t]/(Cos[t] + 1)]
True
then in polar coordinates, x=r Cos[t], y=r Sin[t], r=Sqrt[x^2+y^2],
Tan[t/2] == y/(x+r) ==> t == 2 ArcTan[y/(x+Sqrt[x^2+y^2])]
This formula is also valid when x == 0, whereas ArcTan[y/x] is
problematic there (ArcTan[0,y] is ok, of course).
Cheers,
Paul
_______________________________________________________________________
Paul Abbott Phone: 61 8 6488 2734
School of Physics, M013 Fax: +61 8 6488 1014
The University of Western Australia (CRICOS Provider No 00126G)
AUSTRALIA http://physics.uwa.edu.au/~paul
Prev by Date:
**Re: Re: Fourier Transforms**
Next by Date:
**Re: Re: Possible Bug in ArcTan ?**
Previous by thread:
**Re: Possible Bug in ArcTan ?**
Next by thread:
**Re: Re: Possible Bug in ArcTan ?**
| |