|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: mathematica to word
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg64949] Re: mathematica to word
- From: Mike <m.HoneychurcNOSPAMh at uq.edu.au>
- Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2006 01:00:55 -0500 (EST)
- Organization: University of Queensland
- References: <due7ou$9qq$1@smc.vnet.net> <dujsm7$9bf$1@smc.vnet.net>
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
Not so long ago in this newsgroup Paul Abbott provided a link to some
examples of reports and dissertations (from his department?) written
entirely in Mathematica. It would certainly be the preferred option unless
their was a specific requirement to prepare it in Word. If you do a quick
search you should be able to find that link or if Paul reads this he may
provide it again.
Cheers
Mike
On 7/3/06 10:01 PM, in article dujsm7$9bf$1 at smc.vnet.net, "Mark Westwood"
<markc.westwood at gmail.com> wrote:
> I used Mathematica to write a short dissertation, c60 pages of text
> with graphics, and found this to be far easier than wrestling graphics
> and tables out of Mathematica and into Word. So I concur with the
> earlier posters who recommend that you follow the pure Mathematica
> route.
>
> I did find Mathematica a bit tricky when it came to table of contents
> and similar automatic text, but probably not much more so than Word.
>
> Regards
> Mark Westwood
>
Prev by Date:
Re: Bizarre results with TreePlot
Next by Date:
Re: Extract values and multilpicities from list
Previous by thread:
Re: mathematica to word
Next by thread:
Re: mathematica to word
|