[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Is it possible for me to implement associative arrays this way?
*To*: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
*Subject*: [mg66196] Re: Is it possible for me to implement associative arrays this way?
*From*: dh <dh at metrohm.ch>
*Date*: Thu, 4 May 2006 05:19:36 -0400 (EDT)
*References*: <e39k3l$cms$1@smc.vnet.net>
*Sender*: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
Hi Don,
you can always unprotect a symbol (command Unprotect), define some new
rules for this symbol and re-protect it again (command Protect).
However, I do not understand what you want to do with an "associative
array". I understand this term to mean an un-ordered array. In this case
this is much better implemented by a function. e.g.
We want to assigne:
3->30
6->60
9->90
this is easily done by:
f[3]=30; f[6]=60; f[9]=90
Daniel
Don Taylor wrote:
> I've tried searching the net to see if I could find an answer before
> I bothered folks with this.
>
> I wrote a little bit of code to help someone out. It would have
> been very convenient and clear if I could have used short lists as
> subscripts, something similar to AWK's associative arrays, not what
> Mathematica usually does with lists as subscripts.
>
> With experimenting I think I see how Mathematica uses
> {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6}[[2]];
> {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6}[[{2,3,4}]];
> x={1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6};
> x[[2]];
> x[[2]]=4;
> x[[{2, 3, 4}]] = 5
> x[[{2, 3, 4}]] = {5, 4, 3}
> and even a bit oddly
> x[[{2, 3, 4}]] = {5, 4, 3, 2, 1}
> But the the syntax
> {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6}[[{{2,3,4}}]]
> is not currently used by Mathematica. In other words when a Part
> specification is not an integer or list of integers this isn't used.
>
> So, is there some way I could unprotect some bit of Mathematica,
> insert a tiny bit of code such that if a Part specification was a
> list of a list that it would create a table to implement the
> associative array, and then reprotect Mathematica, for use both on
> the left and right side of '='?
>
> This would be really convenient and not seem to subvert the
> principles too much that Mathematica tries to use.
>
> Thank you
>
Prev by Date:
**Re: Selecting Many Things Rather Than Selecting One Thing From Many**
Next by Date:
**Re: Beginner--Help on using FindRoot to solve the system of equations**
Previous by thread:
**Is it possible for me to implement associative arrays this way?**
Next by thread:
**Re: nearest neighbor**
| |