Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums
-----
 /
MathGroup Archive
2006
*January
*February
*March
*April
*May
*June
*July
*August
*September
*October
*November
*December
*Archive Index
*Ask about this page
*Print this page
*Give us feedback
*Sign up for the Wolfram Insider

MathGroup Archive 2006

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Prefix function syntax f @ x

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg66706] Re: Prefix function syntax f @ x
  • From: David Bailey <dave at Remove_Thisdbailey.co.uk>
  • Date: Sat, 27 May 2006 03:52:55 -0400 (EDT)
  • References: <e53l6f$3rg$1@smc.vnet.net>
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

Kristen W Carlson wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> David Wagner emphasizes that he doesn't use the syntax
> function@argument (p. 37n), no explanation. To me it seems very handy.
> Any thoughts?
> 
> Thank you to Andrzej and others who recommended this excellent book.
> 
> Kris
> 
If you like it, why not use it? I tend to avoid using too many operators 
because I can never remember their precedences! I only use the @ 
operator in J/Link code, where it is equivalent to the '.' in Java.

David Bailey
http://www.dbaileyconsultancy.co.uk


  • Prev by Date: Re: Output Table Format Change
  • Next by Date: Re: Output Table Format Change
  • Previous by thread: RE: Prefix function syntax f @ x
  • Next by thread: Re: Prefix function syntax f @ x