|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Prefix function syntax f @ x
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg66706] Re: Prefix function syntax f @ x
- From: David Bailey <dave at Remove_Thisdbailey.co.uk>
- Date: Sat, 27 May 2006 03:52:55 -0400 (EDT)
- References: <e53l6f$3rg$1@smc.vnet.net>
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
Kristen W Carlson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> David Wagner emphasizes that he doesn't use the syntax
> function@argument (p. 37n), no explanation. To me it seems very handy.
> Any thoughts?
>
> Thank you to Andrzej and others who recommended this excellent book.
>
> Kris
>
If you like it, why not use it? I tend to avoid using too many operators
because I can never remember their precedences! I only use the @
operator in J/Link code, where it is equivalent to the '.' in Java.
David Bailey
http://www.dbaileyconsultancy.co.uk
Prev by Date:
Re: Output Table Format Change
Next by Date:
Re: Output Table Format Change
Previous by thread:
RE: Prefix function syntax f @ x
Next by thread:
Re: Prefix function syntax f @ x
|