|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
RE: Prefix function syntax f @ x
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg66668] RE: [mg66638] Prefix function syntax f @ x
- From: "David Park" <djmp at earthlink.net>
- Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 04:17:42 -0400 (EDT)
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
Kris,
I don't see anything wrong with that construction - provided there is only
one argument. It is often very convenient.
The only problem might be when one combines it with // where the
construction might lack clarity. What do you think the following will give?
f@x@y
f@x // y
f // x@y
David Park
djmp at earthlink.net
http://home.earthlink.net/~djmp/
From: Kristen W Carlson [mailto:carlsonkw at gmail.com]
To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
Hi,
David Wagner emphasizes that he doesn't use the syntax
function@argument (p. 37n), no explanation. To me it seems very handy.
Any thoughts?
Thank you to Andrzej and others who recommended this excellent book.
Kris
Prev by Date:
Re: Prefix function syntax f @ x
Next by Date:
Clearing a symbol known only through a definition
Previous by thread:
Re: Re: Prefix function syntax f @ x
Next by thread:
Re: Prefix function syntax f @ x
|