Mathematica 9 is now available
Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums
-----
 /
MathGroup Archive
2006
*January
*February
*March
*April
*May
*June
*July
*August
*September
*October
*November
*December
*Archive Index
*Ask about this page
*Print this page
*Give us feedback
*Sign up for the Wolfram Insider

MathGroup Archive 2006

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: System`Convert`MathMLDump`identifierQ

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg71026] Re: System`Convert`MathMLDump`identifierQ
  • From: "Chris Chiasson" <chris at chiasson.name>
  • Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 02:52:21 -0500 (EST)
  • References: <acbec1a40611050415k11c75230p1c6ab5cb13aba954@mail.gmail.com>

strike that, I'm not sure how the False got there

On 11/5/06, Chris Chiasson <chris at chiasson.name> wrote:
> just a quick note
>
> XML`MathML`ExpressionToMathML[a]
> ?System`Convert`MathMLDump`identifierQ
>
> the last definition shown is:
>
> System`Convert`MathMLDump`identifierQ[System`Convert`CommonDump`args$___]/;
>     ArgumentCountQ[System`Convert`MathMLDump`identifierQ,
>         Length[HoldComplete[System`Convert`CommonDump`args$]],1,1]&&
>       False:=$Failed
>
> AFAIK, this definition will not ever be used because one the arguments
> of And under Condition is False. I think this situation could be
> caused by putting Condition on level {1} instead of level {2} of the
> definition. The Condition thus evaluates at the assignment of the
> definition instead of at the use thereof.
>
> --
> http://chris.chiasson.name/
>


-- 
http://chris.chiasson.name/


  • Prev by Date: Evaluating integral with varying upper limit?
  • Next by Date: Trigonometric solve
  • Previous by thread: System`Convert`MathMLDump`identifierQ
  • Next by thread: Evaluating integral with varying upper limit?