MathGroup Archive 2006

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Re: 1`2 == 1*^-10

On 11/25/06, Bill Rowe <readnewsciv at> wrote:
>And it doesn't seem to me there would be any
>difficulty in rounding results to two significant digits.

Yea, but I'm lazy. I once wrote some code that would do forward error
propagation (and associated print formatting) at machine (or whatever)
precision if given the initial errors. It has the same problem that I
mentioned with significance arithmetic, where all errors are treated
as independent.


  • Prev by Date: Re: Area of ellipse between major axis and ray through focus, given angle
  • Next by Date: Re: Partition
  • Previous by thread: Re: 1`2 == 1*^-10
  • Next by thread: Re: Re: Re: 1`2 == 1*^-10