Re: Re: Re: 1`2 == 1*^-10
On 26 Nov 2006, at 17:49, Chris Chiasson wrote:
> On 11/25/06, Bill Rowe <readnewsciv at sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>> And it doesn't seem to me there would be any
>> difficulty in rounding results to two significant digits.
> Yea, but I'm lazy. I once wrote some code that would do forward error
> propagation (and associated print formatting) at machine (or whatever)
> precision if given the initial errors. It has the same problem that I
> mentioned with significance arithmetic, where all errors are treated
> as independent.
Since Mathematica already implements forward error propagation at
machine precision by means of the function Interval you do not seem
to all that lazy to me ;-)
Actually, there is a way of doing this with much less overestimation
than Interval arithmetic produces. It is called "affine arithmetic".
There is a Mathematica implementation in a package due to Anita
Uscilowska, which was presented at the IMS 2005.
Prev by Date:
Re: SetPrecision vs N
Next by Date:
Re: Word permutations - frustrated by lists.
Previous by thread:
Re: Re: 1`2 == 1*^-10
Next by thread:
Re: How to Integrate or Differentiate a function of data list?