[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Re: Re: Re: Arithmetic Puzzle (so simple it's hard)

• To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
• Subject: [mg71837] Re: [mg71748] Re: [mg71627] Re: Arithmetic Puzzle (so simple it's hard)
• From: Andrzej Kozlowski <akoz at mimuw.edu.pl>
• Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 06:05:43 -0500 (EST)
• References: <200611141006.FAA06684@smc.vnet.net><ejtda3$isg$1@smc.vnet.net> <200611251037.FAA15617@smc.vnet.net> <200611281104.GAA27839@smc.vnet.net> <CBFE0758-7771-4E26-A091-4A1E01B4CBC7@mimuw.edu.pl>

On 30 Nov 2006, at 17:28, Andrzej Kozlowski wrote:

>  Next, they should try writing functional programs that perform  
> better and are more efficient than Daniel's procedural ones

I meant to say "that perform better and are more readable".

Andrzej Kozlowski

• References:
  • Arithmetic Puzzle (so simple it's hard)
    • From: Bruce Colletti <vze269bv@verizon.net>
  • Re: Arithmetic Puzzle (so simple it's hard)
    • From: croddie@princeton.edu
  • Re: Re: Arithmetic Puzzle (so simple it's hard)
    • From: János <janos.lobb@yale.edu>