|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
2nd RE: Functional decomposition (solving f[f[x]] = g[x] for given g)
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg71819] 2nd RE: [mg71764] Functional decomposition (solving f[f[x]] = g[x] for given g)
- From: "Ingolf Dahl" <ingolf.dahl at telia.com>
- Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 06:05:14 -0500 (EST)
- Reply-to: <ingolf.dahl at telia.com>
Addendum to answer:
Hi again,
Now the "Inverse Symbolic Calculator" at
http://oldweb.cecm.sfu.ca/projects/ISC/ISCmain.html is up and working,
Extract from search for f(0) = 0.6420945043908285:
"6420944524139337 = (0261) 1+2*x+4*x^2+3*x^3-4*x^4-x^5
6420944718605426 = (0191) Prod(1-(3*n^3-8*n^2+3*n+10)/2^n,n=1..inf)
Your value of 6420945043908285 would be here.
6420945157426995 = (0001) Lehmer*(BesJ(1,1)+Cahen)
6420945315416897 = (0001) (GAM(5/6)-GaussK)/GAM(17/24)"
Best regards
Ingolf Dahl
Prev by Date:
How can one produce the unevaluated effect that Mathematica uses on SetOptions and certain Integrate commands?
Next by Date:
Drawing function with 3 variables in a graph
Previous by thread:
Re: How can one produce the unevaluated effect that Mathematica uses on SetOptions and certain Integrate commands?
Next by thread:
Drawing function with 3 variables in a graph
|