MathGroup Archive 2006

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: convergence checking

  • To: mathgroup at
  • Subject: [mg70295] Re: [mg70002] convergence checking
  • From: Darren Glosemeyer <darreng at>
  • Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 05:36:58 -0400 (EDT)
  • References: <>

Inequalities along this line are mentioned in the documentation for 
PrecisionGoal and AccuracyGoal.  One way to implement this is via a 
While loop of the following form

old=(* insert or compute initial value here *);
new=(* insert or compute next iteration here *);
    new=(* insert or compute next iteration here *)];

To avoid a non-terminating loop in cases where the method does not 
converge, you can add a counter variable that gets incremented at each 
step in the While loop and checked against an iteration limit in the 
While test. Alternately, NestWhile could be used to put a cap on the 
number of iterations.

Darren Glosemeyer
Wolfram Research

Chris Chiasson wrote:
> Somewhere in the Mathematica documentation, there is an expression like
> Abs[new-old]<10^(-acc)+Abs[old]*10^-(prec)
> suggested for use as a convergence criteria. I can't find it again,
> and I'm hoping someone will point me to it.
> Also, if you have any pointers about checking convergence (ignoring
> other factors like movement along a contour line causing large changes
> in the solution but no changes in function value), I would like to
> hear them.
> The dicussion at
> (around eqn 10.1.2)
> is interesting, though I am not sure I understand how to implement it
> (in the context of Mathematica programming of an optimization
> routine).

  • Prev by Date: Re: Automate datafitting to a series of parameterized function
  • Next by Date: Re: Ordinate in Plot Command
  • Previous by thread: Re: Re: Definition of SE (standard error) in LinearRegress and NonlinearRegress
  • Next by thread: Linear bonding model using Mathematica