|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Programming style: postfix/prefix vs. functional
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg70596] Re: Programming style: postfix/prefix vs. functional
- From: "Jens-Peer Kuska" <kuska at informatik.uni-leipzig.de>
- Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2006 05:13:27 -0400 (EDT)
- Organization: Uni Leipzig
- References: <eha5kn$b82$1@smc.vnet.net>
Hi,
the good style is the code that *you* understand
today and when *you* look on it in 6 weeks and in
five years.
Regards
Jens
"Will Robertson" <wspr81 at gmail.com> schrieb im
Newsbeitrag news:eha5kn$b82$1 at smc.vnet.net...
| Hello,
|
| As a newcomer to Mathematica, I'm a little
unsure on what "good style"
| would be in this programming language. I notice
that several functions
| have prefix and postfix notations such as //.
for ReplaceRepeated, /@
| for Map, and so on.
|
| Clearly using these forms makes the code more
compact, but sacrifices
| some level of readability. Are there guidelines
or suggestions that
| have built up over the years of whether these
are "good" or "bad" to
| use?
|
| If it's simply personal preference, what do you
like to use?
| --
| Many thanks,
| Will Robertson
|
Prev by Date:
undocumented setting for the Frame option revised!
Next by Date:
Re: Problem in loading packages in Mathematica
Previous by thread:
Re: Programming style: postfix/prefix vs. functional
Next by thread:
Re: Programming style: postfix/prefix vs. functional
|