|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Programming style: postfix/prefix vs. functional
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg70609] Re: [mg70587] Programming style: postfix/prefix vs. functional
- From: János <janos.lobb at yale.edu>
- Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2006 05:13:50 -0400 (EDT)
- References: <200610200921.FAA11092@smc.vnet.net>
On Oct 20, 2006, at 5:21 AM, Will Robertson wrote:
> Hello,
>
> As a newcomer to Mathematica, I'm a little unsure on what "good style"
> would be in this programming language. I notice that several functions
> have prefix and postfix notations such as //. for ReplaceRepeated, /@
> for Map, and so on.
>
> Clearly using these forms makes the code more compact, but sacrifices
> some level of readability. Are there guidelines or suggestions that
> have built up over the years of whether these are "good" or "bad" to
> use?
>
> If it's simply personal preference, what do you like to use?
> --
> Many thanks,
> Will Robertson
"Resistance is futile. You will be assimilated."
You have to learned it ALL :)
János
--------------------------------------------------
Lunatics always attain their goals better than normal people do. It
happens because there are no moral boundaries for them: no shame, no
truthfulness, no conscience, and not even fear. <Leo Tolstoy>
Prev by Date:
Re: "short circuiting" And and Or
Next by Date:
Re: General--LinearSolve and Precision: Impossible to solve 8x8 matrix
Previous by thread:
Programming style: postfix/prefix vs. functional
Next by thread:
Re: Programming style: postfix/prefix vs. functional
|