Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums
-----
 /
MathGroup Archive
2006
*January
*February
*March
*April
*May
*June
*July
*August
*September
*October
*November
*December
*Archive Index
*Ask about this page
*Print this page
*Give us feedback
*Sign up for the Wolfram Insider

MathGroup Archive 2006

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Programming style: postfix/prefix vs. functional

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg70587] Programming style: postfix/prefix vs. functional
  • From: "Will Robertson" <wspr81 at gmail.com>
  • Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 05:21:57 -0400 (EDT)

Hello,

As a newcomer to Mathematica, I'm a little unsure on what "good style"
would be in this programming language. I notice that several functions
have prefix and postfix notations such as //. for ReplaceRepeated, /@
for Map, and so on.

Clearly using these forms makes the code more compact, but sacrifices
some level of readability. Are there guidelines or suggestions that
have built up over the years of whether these are "good" or "bad" to
use?

If it's simply personal preference, what do you like to use?
--
Many thanks,
Will Robertson


  • Prev by Date: Re: damped oscilations data fit
  • Next by Date: complex eigenvectors
  • Previous by thread: GraphPlot documentation
  • Next by thread: Re: Programming style: postfix/prefix vs. functional