Re: Re: Re: Re: solve and Abs

*To*: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net*Subject*: [mg69574] Re: [mg69530] Re: [mg69456] Re: [mg69398] Re: solve and Abs*From*: Andrzej Kozlowski <akoz at mimuw.edu.pl>*Date*: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 06:47:52 -0400 (EDT)*References*: <200609141057.GAA21684@smc.vnet.net> <F49BEBC3-F1E0-499A-B59E-CDB333F96570@yale.edu>

On 15 Sep 2006, at 01:21, János wrote: >> And it seems to me that "something" is a >> little better than "nothing in particular". >> >> Andrzej Kozlowski >> > > According to Hegel something is a negated nothing or... a > "particular nothing" - particular in that sense that it is negated :) > > Cosmologists love it. They call it "false vacuum". > > /Just kidding/ > > János Now it seems to me that I should have written 'And it seems to me that "something", even 0, is a little better than "nothing in particular".' Leaving Hegel aside, (or wherever he is now, which is either Nowhere or in not a very comfortable place to be) there appears to be something Zen Buddhist about the answer {{}} that Solve returns when given a tautological equation, like: In[1]:= Solve[x==x,{x}] Out[1]= {{}} The answer looks like "nothing", but in some sense it also means "everything". In other words, Nothingness ==The Universe == The Absolute, etc, etc... (I guess that means that the union of {{}} and {{x->0}} ought to be indeed {{}}, except that in this particular problem {{}} was a False Absolute or False Nothingness, oh well...) Andrzej

**References**:**Re: Re: Re: solve and Abs***From:*Andrzej Kozlowski <akoz@mimuw.edu.pl>

**Re: Q: How to animate a list plot?**

**Re: Summing elements within a List or Array**

**Re: Re: Re: Re: solve and Abs**

**Re: Re: Re: solve and Abs**