[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: How to tell Mathematica to stop conditional testing in an If
*To*: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
*Subject*: [mg69542] Re: How to tell Mathematica to stop conditional testing in an If
*From*: dh <dh at metrohm.ch>
*Date*: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 06:45:02 -0400 (EDT)
statment if one condition is niether True or False? McCarthy evaluation rules?
'and then' test?
References: <eebfu3$5dt$1 at smc.vnet.net>
Organization: hispeed.ch
X-Wrienvfrom: <mathgroup-adm at smc.vnet.net>
X-Wrienvto: <ldegler at wolfram.com>
X-Wrienvto: <onkars at wolfram.com>
X-Wrienvto: <brucem at wolfram.com>
X-Wrienvto: <overmann at wolfram.com>
X-Wrienvto: <emre at wolfram.com>
X-Wrienvto: <mauricios at wolfram.com>
X-Wrienvto: <xwen at wolfram.com>
X-Wrienvto: <chrisw at wolfram.com>
X-Wrienvto: <darreng at wolfram.com>
X-Wrienvto: <ericb at wolfram.com>
X-Wrienvto: <brenton at wolfram.com>
X-Wrienvto: <l-mathgroup at wolfram.com>
X-Wrienvto: <layland at wolfram.com>
X-Wrienvto: <fredm at wolfram.com>
X-Wrienvto: <carlson at wolfram.com>
X-Wrienvto: <dkapadia at wolfram.com>
X-Wrienvto: <jasonh at wolfram.com>
X-Wrienvto: <pratikd at wolfram.com>
X-Wrienvto: <marykab at wolfram.com>
X-Wrienvto: <stevec at wolfram.com>
X-PMX-Version: 4.7.1.128075, Antispam-Engine: 2.4.0.264935, Antispam-Data: 2006.9.15.51443
Hi Nasser,
SameQ(or "===" will return "False" if the condition is false or
undecideable.
Daniel
Nasser Abbasi wrote:
> I can better describe this with simple example:
>
> ------------- code ------------
>
> Remove["Global`*"];
> xc = Table[i, {i, 1, 3}]
> x = 5;
> If[x == b && xc[[10]] == 4, Print["True"], Print["False"], Print["Can't
> decide"]]
>
> ----- end code -------------
> In the above, 'x==b' is neither True nor False, since 'b' has no numerical
> value.
>
> But what I want is when this happens, for Mathematica to NOT continue with
> the testing if xc[[10]]==4 is True (because even if it is True, it will
> not change the outcome, which is can't decide.
>
> I am looking for something like 'and then' which says to test the next
> condition only if the one just tested was true.
>
> The interesting thing is that if 'b' had a value, say 7, which makes the
> first test (the x==b) to be False, then Mathematica does the right thing,
> and will not try to check the xc[[10]]==4 condition. I need it to do the
> same thing when also the result of the check is 'undecided', not just
> 'False' or 'True'.
>
> Is there a way to do this? Notice in the example above, I get the error
> that xc[[10]] is out of bound, but still get the can't decide message.
>
> It is clear to me that the way Mathematica does it now is not the right way.
> I do not see why it tries to check for xc[[10]]==4 when it will not make a
> difference to the final result.
>
> any thoughts?
>
> thanks,
> Nasser
>
>
>
Prev by Date:
**Re: Summing elements within a List or Array**
Next by Date:
**Re: How to tell Mathematica to stop conditional testing in an If statment if one condition is niether True or False? McCarthy evaluation rules? 'and then' test?**
Previous by thread:
**Re: How to animate a list plot?**
Next by thread:
**Variables Within Homemade Functions**
| |